Search for: "People v. Long (1987)" Results 21 - 40 of 677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Millions of people (including quite a few in the legal profession) have lost their jobs. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:04 pm by Michael O'Hear
 In fact, it turns out that Minnesota has far more total people under criminal-justice supervision than Wisconsin. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:49 am by Michael M. O'Hear
 In fact, it turns out that Minnesota has far more total people under criminal-justice supervision than Wisconsin. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:40 am by J
Which brings us to Raja v Aviram[2016] UKUT 102 (LC). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
Not too long ago a case here in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Slater v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am by Lisa Ramsey
” Some commentators believe that dilution laws may survive constitutional scrutiny under the Supreme Court’s approach in the 1987 case San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 pm by Nathan
And for as long as we’ve been in the game, the bulk of federal criminal practice has been devoted to dealing with the Guidelines. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
Finally, the long awaited Upper Tribunal decision on room size and the bedroom tax has ben released. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm by royblack
Supreme Court decided Gideon v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am by Transplanted Lawyer
  But the real damage in that sphere has been done a long time ago, probably in 1973 and certainly by 1987. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
So written terms that people intended as a complete and final expression of their bargain on the subject cannot be supplemented or contradicted by evidence of prior agreements or any oral contemporaneous agreements. [read post]