Search for: "People v. Ming"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
View the article here07/10/2008The California Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide whether a popular law that allows sexually violent predators to be confined indefinitely is constitutional.At their weekly conference in San Francisco, the justices voted 5-2, with Justices Ming Chin and Marvin Baxter in the minority, to grant the defendant's petition for review in People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:51 pm
It would have overturned a California Supreme Court decision, People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
In the case of Pui Kwan Kay v Ming Pao Holdings [2015] HKCA 540 the Court of Appeal allowed the defendant’s appeal in a libel case brought by the vice-chairman of the Hong Kong Football Association after the Court of Appeal ruled the paper made its comments in the public interest. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 10:49 pm
The headline of this post is a bit misleading in that, the court will determine only one facet of Jessica's law as implemented in California, it is with respect to civil commitment.7-10-2008 California:The California Supreme Court agreed yesterday to decide whether a popular law that allows sexually violent predators to be confined indefinitely is constitutional.At their weekly conference in San Francisco, the justices voted 5-2, with Justices Ming Chin and Marvin Baxter in the… [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am
” At the ImmigrationProf Blog, Ming Hsu Chen charts the next steps after last week’s decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 9:48 am
Peru and Sanum v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:04 am
Oakley, John V. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 3:12 am
”Hong KongHKSAR v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 4:38 pm
SingaporeOng Ming Johnson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
Amelia Womack, the deputy leader of the Green Party, has complained to IPSO about the front page story, along with around 300 other people. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:15 am
In Shanghai Turbo Enterprises Ltd v Liu Ming [2019] SGCA 11, the Court of Appeal was faced with an unusual clause: “This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of Singapore/or People’s Republic of China and each of the parties hereto submits to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Courts of Singapore/or People’s Republic of China. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
t we leave this to the people to decide? [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 9:08 pm
Patent and Trademark Office updated its guidance related to the recent United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
(Pix credit here: With eye on China, EU parliament pushes tougher line on investments)Europe appears to be faced, again, with the hard task of balancing its relations among frenemies while retaining its wealth. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:11 am
Promissory estoppel: Barnes v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Section on Indian Nations and Indigenous Peoples Breakfast ? [read post]
