Search for: "People v. Municipal Court (1970)"
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
In 1972, a 4-1-4 Supreme Court decision said "yes" in federal cases, no in state cases; the Supreme Court will now reconsider it.The case is Ramos v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
In the early 1970s, New Hampshire disqualified citizens from voting in a municipality if they had a “firm intention” of leaving that town at a fixed time in the future. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am
Together, Jackson (who later became a judge on the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas), Liacouras, then-Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Clifford Scott Green, then-Philadelphia Municipal Court Judge Paul Dandridge and W. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:09 am
DWI attorney Evan Levow advocates for the rights of people who are facing alleged DWI charges in New Jersey municipal courts. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
” In First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm
See Brown v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:43 am
Rupp v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Some view property tax limitations as a sensible constraint on the growth of government, or as a fail-safe to avoid pricing people out of their own homes. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Blais v Alberta (Minister of Municipal Affairs), 2018 ABQB 71 [69] The Minister submits that it was her discretionary policy decision to make the Report available to the public, in order to ensure transparency and accountability to the people of Alberta. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
” The California Supreme Court declared later in People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
” The California Supreme Court declared later in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:58 am
Dist. (1970); see also Kistler v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
The Court rejected that interpretation, reasoning that a decision based on cost and community disruption would always favor building highways through parkland, which is already municipally owned and where people do not live, such that adopting the Secretary's interpretation would make the statutory requirement close to pointless. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
The Journey 4 Justice members were found guilty by the Topeka Municipal Court but are now appealing to the Topeka District Court, where they will get a new trial. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
The new state law does just that and prevents municipalities from adopting any similar provisions designed to protect LGBT individuals against discrimination.Second, the legislature apparently wanted to ensure that courts would not interpret the state’s ban on sex discrimination to include gender identity or sexual orientation. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
’ Its most controversial moment, however, came before it even opened, in the early 1970s. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
First, the Supreme Court held in Oncale v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
