Search for: "People v. Neal"
Results 21 - 40
of 290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
Neal Kumar Katyal, Philadelphia’s lawyer, explained that studies from around the country show that nondiscrimination programs “increase, not decrease” the number of people available to care for foster children because it opens them to people who had previously been excluded. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:07 am
People who are always trying to do the right thing. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
Neal Puckett asked, “What did you do as a soldier. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Following yesterday's Supreme Court opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
Nearby is Neal Katyal, who was Acting Solicitor General after Elena Kagan joined the court. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:03 am
Arizona v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:18 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:18 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:30 pm
Neal). [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:46 pm
In People v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:59 am
What Congress may not do under the Commerce Clause is explained in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:05 am
[For The Conference on The Future of Sexual And Reproductive Rights]Neal DevinsTwenty-one years after Robert Bork's failed Supreme Court nomination and sixteen years after Pennsylvania v Casey, the rhetoric of abortion politics sounds eerily familiar. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 7:08 am
Decisions like Roe and Miranda v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:30 pm
The material witness statute represents a dramatic departure to the rule, allowing the arrest of uncharged, innocent, even cooperative people. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 10:36 am
In Patriot Homes v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 11:20 am
Supreme Court, Robert Cooter of UC Berkeley Law School and I developed a theory of Congress's taxing power that anticipated, and may have influenced, the Court's taxing power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: Georgetown Law's Neal Katyal and Randy Barnett on Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:58 am
People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:01 pm
The only people it could have “looked bad” for would be members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
The tactical shift was not universally welcomed by African-Americans: critics like Zora Neale Hurston howled at the implication that black learning could be insured only by proximity to white children. [read post]
