Search for: "People v. Neuberger" Results 21 - 40 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm by Giles Peaker
It is also emphasized that the comparator must be with ordinary people, not ordinary homeless people. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am by INFORRM
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by JONATHAN GLASSON QC, MATRIX
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
These attacks included a Daily Mail front page which described three high court judges as “enemies of the people. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
It is inevitable…that there will always be some people who can and will ‘join up the dots’, although that is not to imply that they can publish their conclusion. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am by MATHEW PURCHASE
The majority (Lords Neuberger, Toulson, Reed and Sumption) held that it was not reasonable to expect a more peremptory notice. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Lord Neuberger remarks: “It bears repeating that we are not being asked to overturn the result of the EU Referendum. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
 He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule – this is… [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It should be added that, as with all Supreme Court proceedings, this appeal will be live streamed on our website, so it is not necessary for people to attend the building in person to watch the hearing. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 4:42 am by Jack Ballantyne
  With reference to judicial inconsistency on a point of disclosure in the judgment of Vernon v Bosley , Lord Neuberger then demonstrated that litigation best practice had in some areas been left in a “state of complete uncertainty”. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Anspor v Neuberger, 2016 ONSC 75 [1] This application involves a dispute over who owns two Toronto Maple Leafs (the “Leafs”) season tickets (the “Tickets”). [read post]