Search for: "People v. New" Results 21 - 40 of 40,973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
However, review of the constitutionality of New York's Persistent Felony Offender sentencing law is still being sought in the certiorari petition filed on March 10, 2011 in the direct appeal in People v Battles [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:58 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Last week, the California Appellate Court in a lengthy opinion (116 pages) overturned the murder conviction of Michael Pizarro (People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:06 am by Evan Lee
The post Court limits new trials for people with felon-in-possession convictions appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:42 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
New York, which is scheduled for November 30th. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:33 pm by SO Issues
The court may also consider "reliable hearsay," including the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (People v Hucks, 72 A.D.3d 1608, 1609, lv denied 15 N.Y.3d 706; see People v Cunning . . [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:45 am
  This new lawsuit opens up a new front in the battle that the religious right has been fighting to roll back protections for trans people. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:57 am by Immigration Prof
New York, the challenge to the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people unlawfully in the country from the state-by-state breakdown used to allocate seats in the House.... [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The law does not require the same degree of proof to hold a defendant for action of the Grand Jury as is demanded for conviction; however, the proof must be sufficient on its face to sustain conviction of the defendant akin to People v Eckert and People v Donahue. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 2:28 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
NYTimes.com: Court Affirms New York State Law Governing Anonymous Juries People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
April 16, 2020) The post Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]