Search for: "People v. Ortega"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 7:58 am
In last week’s case (Savoie v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 9:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 6:20 am
” Ortega v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:46 am
” Ortega v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 10:11 am
District Court in Phoenix issued a 142-page decision against Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) in Ortega Melendres v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm
” This Strickland v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 1:46 pm
For example, in People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 3:15 pm
Assn. for Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
Ortega v. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
13 Jul 2009, 1:57 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 12:40 pm
While temporal proximity between the protected activity and an adverse action may be sufficient circumstantial evidence of a causal connection for purposes of a prima facie case, see Ortega v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:18 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am
Throw in the nearly half-million people who cross the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Generations of people in the community were poisoned by lead, arsenic and other toxic substances, resulting in a devastating array of physical and mental illnesses and in some cases, death. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm
Ortega. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:07 pm
Defendants’ pattern and practice of racial profiling goes beyond these sweeps to include widespread, day-to-day targeting and mistreatment of persons who appear to be Latino The case is Ortega Melendres, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:09 pm
Ortega v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Flores-Ortega: No absolute requirement that attorney appeal conviction of a defendant who pleads guilty. 2002 Bell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:32 pm
The ACLU is currently suing to end the MPP, with the 9th Circuit having heard arguments in the case, Innovation Law Lab v. [read post]
