Search for: "People v. Ortiz"
Results 21 - 40
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 7:50 pm
" The Court explained that It is well settled that showup identifications are generally disfavored because they are inherently suggestive by nature, but they nevertheless are not "presumptively infirm" (People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541, 543; see People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533, 537). [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:23 am
This case asks whether you can sue the medical provider for charging more than 75 cents.The case is Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The People have the initial burden of going forward to show the “lack of any undue suggestiveness” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990]; People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 [1997]). [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 6:06 am
It is styled, Shemily Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm
U.S., No. 13-127, Ortiz-Zape v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
July 6, 2020) People v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:18 am
The Texas Supreme Court explains how this works in, Ortiz v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
In Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:23 am
People yelled. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:09 pm
([C]ompare People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:38 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:04 am
People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm
At Wednesday’s oral argument in Culbertson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
The majority’s opinion in that case, Ortiz v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-7394; Ortiz-Zape v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am
Lest anyone think this is merely a poor choice by a panel from the 10th Circuit, consider the decision of the California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 7:57 am
It was reasonable for Ortiz to rely on the words and gesture of Maria Juarez, the proprietress of the house and the wife of Porfirio, to conclude that he was authorized to push the doors open and step in the rooms in order to communicate with the people inside. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
Foster v. [read post]
