Search for: "People v. Phillips (1997)"
Results 21 - 40
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2016, 9:58 am
Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 461 (1997). [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 7:59 am
A plaque on the house where Alighieri was born in Florence, photo by Dante Figueroa (1997). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:09 am
Davis, 126 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 1997). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:35 am
In Brand v Berki [2014] EWHC 2979 (QB), a masseuse was held to have harassed celebrity couple, Russell Brand and Jemima Khan, by accusing them of serious criminal offending in the media, in emails to numerous people, and in an online petition. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
For those who would like to read an in-depth analysis of the case, I can recommend an article in the European Intellectual Property Review written by someone called Jeremy Phillips (who ever he is). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Oliver edited by Jim Phillips, R. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Mein v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
In reviewing the charge for legal sufficiency, "each case is fact specific" (Johnson, 95 NY2d at 373) and the allegations must be analyzed in the context of "the whole incident" (Hogle, 18 Misc 3d at 871, citing People v Tichenor, 89 NY2d 769, 776 [1997]). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Oliver edited by Jim Phillips, R. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
“Harassment” is an ordinary English word, but it can take many different forms, and most people would regard stalking as the paradigm case of harassment. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Berwind Corp., 690 A.2d 186 (Pa. 1997)(a manufacturer may be held strictly liable for subsequent changes to an otherwise safe product, where such alterations are reasonably foreseeable; and, an otherwise safe product can be deemed “defective” for strict liability purposes if it is distributed without adequate warnings to notify the user of the dangers inherent in the product.), Phillips v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
The court in McDonald wondered whether they should have been invited to return to the source of the problem, which is R v Gloucestershire CC ex p Barry [1997] AC 584. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
The Press Gazette reports that Charlotte Church is suing the The People newspaper for a story that alleged she proposed to her boyfriend while drunk and singing karaoke in a pub. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Hutchison v. [read post]
