Search for: "People v. Powell (1991)" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The ultimately controlling opinions were those issued jointly by three justices: Stewart, Powell, and, of course, Stevens. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:11 am by Brian Evans
” –Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell, to his biographer in 1991. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913, 918 (Tex. 1991) Also seemingly rare, there have been cases when the trial court was deemed to be not acting pursuant to its discretion because it did not act in relation to the appropriate guiding rules. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Powell, who voted in favor of upholding the death penalty in and Furman v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Bush (Souter 1990; Thomas 1991); Clinton first term (Ginsburg 1993; Breyer 1994); and George W. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Bush (Souter 1990; Thomas 1991); Clinton first term (Ginsburg 1993; Breyer 1994); and George W. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:25 am by INFORRM
The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ RightsEgyptian Initiative for Personal Rights v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:09 pm
Lowry, supra; or the right of one accused of crime to the benefit of counsel, Powell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has an article assessing the legal quagmire that leaves the 29,725 people born by egg or sperm donation between 1 August 1991 and 1 April 2005 unable to learn about their parentage because donors were given life-long anonymity. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
First, the criminal defamation statute arguably fails to provide "people of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to understand what conduct it prohibits" and what speech is acceptable…. [read post]