Search for: "People v. Powers (1984)" Results 21 - 40 of 599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Janus, Justice Kagan’s dissent for herself and three others, quoting from the 1984 Arizona v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:38 pm
Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984), where the Court held the police power and the public use clause are "coterminous," and Kelo v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Yet, the NDA Government has not officially communicated to the people why it thought it fit to bring in these twin Ordinances. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am by Adam Thimmesch
(I believe that it should, as do most people who have studied the issue.) [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:51 pm by cdw
Elsewhere in the Sixth Circuit, people weren’t so lucky: Middlebrooks v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the restraints on government power often differ under the two strands as well: Compelling people to include facts in their coherent speech products (say, in their newspapers), thus altering the content of their speech, is generally unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the restraints on government power often differ under the two strands as well: Compelling people to include facts in their coherent speech products (say, in their newspapers), thus altering the content of their speech, is generally unconstitutional. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
The Justices considered two previous judgments in which it/the House of Lords has held suspicionless stop and search powers to comply with article 8 (R (Gillan) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12; Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] UKSC 49) and the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) decision in Gillan v UK (2010) application no. 4158/05, in which it held that the suspicionless search power under section 44… [read post]
  Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
 Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]