Search for: "People v. Privitier" Results 21 - 40 of 140
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:51 am by Dennis Crouch
Retroactive Application of IPRs: Security People, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
People v Austin  2021 NY Slip Op 30276(U) January 29, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 451533/2019 Judge: O. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The counterclaim alleged that the husband’s activities included sexual intercourse and was without the wife’s consent, connivance, privity, or procurement. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The recent arbitration decision in Acadia University v Acadia University Faculty Association is instructive in this regard. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division rejected Respondent's "factual parsing of the incident" and concluded that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel precluded the ALJ from deciding again whether Petitioner's conduct amounted to physical abuse of the service recipient.Citing D'Arata v New York Cent. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
We will suggest that “New Era” socialist consultative democracy is not built around popular elections and the rise of political parties, but around engagement in governance exercised through the organs that bring together the CPC and the United Front parties within the Chinese People’s Political and Consultative Conference (CPPCC). [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
This duty could be extrapolated from Williams v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Waymo never entered a contract with Uber at all; they were not in privity. [read post]