Search for: "People v. RC"
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2016, 12:19 am
While many people can help keep their older cars in good shape by getting their vehicles regularly maintained, many older vehicles do not have the technologies that newer cars do to assist drivers in avoiding crashes. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:32 pm
Her constructive discharge and retaliation claims also advanced (Bryant v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
The most recent military government took power in 1976; it perpetrated many human rights violations, including killing about 30,000 people. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:40 am
The plaintiffs filed their lawsuit, Betts v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Essentially, an ECS would be a service like webmail[5], and an RCS would be a cloud storage service[6], well at least they way most people may think about them. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Newsom v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
Pixley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 3:13 pm
The court finds that it was error for the County Court to have permitted RC to state his profession. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:27 pm
A little Friday trivia to start your happy hour/weekend (where do people go for happy hour these days anyway? [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:55 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am
Either way, you can bet on the Court’s eventual decision being both contentious and momentous; these are the kinds of cases that people will be studying a century from now, taking their place with Dred Scott, Plessy v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:10 am
Back in 2003 the Supreme Court held in State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:33 am
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
Universities are places where people make informed decisions after carefully studying the relevant factors and arguments involved in a thoughtful way. [read post]
