Search for: "People v. Rea"
Results 21 - 40
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2012, 8:11 pm
The Court also analogized the affirmative defense to the New York case of People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:42 pm
Should society hold people accountable for violating laws–without any mens rea–that few if any experts know exist? [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:50 pm
Why press the law so far to make a plethora of innocent people felons? [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm
Suarez and People v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:03 am
Stanford student Daniel Matro discusses the opinion in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
[Ken Womble, Fault Lines on Long Island case of People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am
On Monday, the first day of the new Supreme Court term, the Court heard argument in Kahler v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
In such cases, the prosecution need only prove that the defendant possessed the requisite mens rea and caused the end result, be it as a principal or accessory. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
Colon, which had held that an indictment which tracked the language of the statute was defective if didn’t specify a mens rea; State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
On December 15, 2011, the Florida Supreme Court released an interesting opinion in Del Valle v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court held in Kahler v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 3:39 pm
See Staples v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
To state the question as simply as I can: assuming Section 230 otherwise immunizes the defendant, can a FOSTA plaintiff get around it by showing a lower mens rea (1595), or must it show the higher mens rea required by 1591? [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Rosas, 8 NY3d 493, 499), the mens rea and actus reus in depraved indifference circumstances need not necessarily be simultaneous (see generally People v Kibbe, 35 NY2d 407; People v Galle, 77 NY2d 953 [criminally negligent homicide]). [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 2:50 am
There is a strong presumption that criminal offences require mens rea. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
A group of business, legal and defense organizations are undertaking an amicus effort in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:36 am
The California Supreme Court addressed that issue today in the context of probation violations in People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
R. v. [read post]
