Search for: "People v. Ricci"
Results 21 - 40
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 5:02 am
From the motion for a preliminary injunction in Ricci v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 3:21 pm
Disparate impact was established United States Supreme Court as Ricci v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:50 am
What Ricci v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:05 am
I suppose for Connecticut, the Ricci v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia explained in his concurring opinion in Ricci v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Dolan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:19 pm
Deborah HellmanTomorrow the Supreme Court hears arguments in Ricci v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:50 pm
Tags: Chicago, discrimination law, disparate impact, EEOC, police, testing Related posts October 21 roundup (1) May 14 roundup (2) January 12 roundup (4) Deep pocket files: Yong Huang v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
" Slate has this opinion piece on the new lawsuit by a New Haven firefighter against the same promotion test challenged in Ricci v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:49 am
.* Although Ringhand and Collins don't say it in so many terms, the conclusion people are drawing is that hearings are substantive, meaningful, and beneficial, not the "vapid and hollow charade" that Professor Kagan decried in her sure-to-be-talked-about 1995 article. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm
Attorneys Paul V. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:51 am
Sure, it didn't have the media hype of 2009's Ricci v. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 8:00 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
The real world implications of a perhaps higher profile OT08 case, Ricci v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
This concern emerged prominently in Ricci v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:22 pm
The case most discussed by Sotomayor's interlocutors was Ricci v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
9:45: 15 minutes in and Senator Leahy is throwing her a softball on Ricci v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:11 pm
In Lindke v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:29 am
Tags: churches, discrimination law, EEOC, Supreme Court Related posts Supreme Court to consider scope of ministerial exemption (0) Now up at Forbes.com: my reactions on Ricci (7) May 14 roundup (2) “We were getting people with 60 hours of college credit who were reading at a third-grade level. [read post]
