Search for: "People v. Royale" Results 21 - 40 of 861
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 11:49 pm
  Kiobel itself is one of a series of cases arising from claims that Royal Dutch Petroleum was complicit in human rights abuses against the Ogoni people in Nigeria. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:37 am by INFORRM
  As might be expected the Jurats are generally retired people. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:06 am by INFORRM
The trial of the case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins concluded on Wednesday 1 March 2017, Day 3 of the trial before Mr Justice Warby in Court 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:03 pm
"Sadly, for him, that's where his luck runs out:"But as he attempted to cross the border control point, he behaved suspiciously, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police tried to apprehend him. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am by SHG
It all seems so sanitary from a distance, but it’s a royal mess up close. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am by Jennifer Davis
As an adult, he was frequently called Ke Ali‘i Maka‘āinana (Prince of the People), for the services he gave to the Hawaiian people. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:56 am by Jim Walker
These terms have been held to be binding by the United States Supreme Court in Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 Critics fear the Tories will now move to cripple Ofcom — and then quietly relax the restrictions on Sky News … THE PRESS GANG campaign — The People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:33 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Under the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970, s 2(1) disabled people have a right to practical assistance from their local authority to meet their needs. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 11:03 am by Alasdair Henderson
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital and Botham (FC) v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58 – read judgment. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]