Search for: "People v. Royale"
Results 21 - 40
of 862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
(EcuRed, Letra del Año)).The object of the annual letter is to provide guidance for the nation and its people, as well as more technical advice for the orisha communities of initiates and believers. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:18 pm
In Charles Royall v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The latest book from journalist and royal reporter, Omid Scobie was embroiled in controversy this week, when the Dutch translation of the publication named two members of the royal family who were alleged in 2021 to have speculated about the skin colour of Prince Harry’s unborn son. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:16 pm
However, common law, such as R v Ruzic and R v Ryan notes that the list of excluded offences under section 17 is unconstitutional as that risks convicting morally innocent individuals. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:39 am
AI should: (i) comply with equalities legislation; (ii) be inclusive by design; (iii) not discriminate unlawfully or perpetuate such discrimination from “input” data; (iv) meet the needs of those from lower socio-economic groups, older people and disabled people; and (v) generate data that is findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
Similarly, history is full of royal pretenders and alleged monarchs. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
On 26 October 2023, the Online Safety Act received royal assent. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Parliament has passed the Online Safety Bill, which will become law as soon as it receives Royal Assent. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] United States of America v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am
It will now go to the House of Commons for final consideration ahead of Royal Assent. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:29 am
State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 2:13 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the recent judgment of the High Court of England and Wales in the Lifestyle Equities v Berkshire Polo trade mark dispute. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm
Porchlight helps people to find, but cannot guarantee access to, permanent housing. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Thomas’ confirmation became a battle royale after Anita Hill accused him of of sexual harassment. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
Canada The Social Media Law Bulletin and Michael Geist blogs provide updates on Bill C-18 (Online News Act), which recently received royal assent and is expected to come into force by the end of 2023. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum (2013), Jesner v. [read post]
