Search for: "People v. Samples (1996)" Results 21 - 40 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2013, 8:18 am by Eric Alexander
Coll., 77 F.3d 364, 366 (11th  Cir. 1996), and Magluta v. [read post]
North Dakota, 579 U.S. __ (1996), that it’s fine for police to obtain an OUI breath sample without a search warrant from a person under arrest for OUI. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
There was that Beaumont Hospital case involving allegations about delivery of an incorrect free sample of a device. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm by Steve Bainbridge
State, 1996 WL 33482455, at *152-64 (July 24, 1996) (detailing Grace's role in the trial). [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am by Shea Denning
App. 1996) (upholding lawfulness of search carried out pursuant to school policy authorizing random searches of students in high school classrooms with hand-held metal detector wands; a gun was discovered in the student’s coat); People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Martinez testified that although the precise numbers fluctuate, the percentages in the four-month sample period were generally reflective of the population of vehicles the MVD monitors for any given period.State v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:53 am by Eric Goldman
A sampling: Defendant could make changes that would minimize predators’ access to children. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:02 am by Bill Marler
” “Getting more germs out of the chicken and turkey we eat is an important step in protecting people from foodborne illness,” said Robert V. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Here are the facts of the case from the decision of the California Supreme Court on direct appeal, People v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Shakur, 164 F.R.D. 359, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (sexual assault case) (quoting S. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
Biscup, 109 3d 855, 673 N.E.2d 225, 231 (Ohio App. 1996); Balderston v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 8:07 pm
Attorney Daniel Alter in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Doe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm by The Legal Blog
Kamal Nath & Ors [1996] in SC 1608 that “We cannot cheat on DNA”.Further in Shri Banarsi Dass V. [read post]