Search for: "People v. Sellers (1988)" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
What all apps do not in themselves provide, is the solicitor-client relationship with its many benefits, which benefits cannot be provided by the buyer-seller relationship of transactions involving apps when used without lawyers. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
There are all sorts of info problems, including overproduction, reciprocity problems (seller worried about giving poor rating out of fear of getting poor rating), asymmetry, information that is out of date (right to be forgotten), etc. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 “Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Looked at opinions issued after 1988 revision became effective. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 2:31 am
The Katpoll on Case C-128/11 UsedSoft v Oracle is now closed (background here). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
”  Restate­ment (Third) of Torts, Products Liability) §9 (1998); accord id. at comment a (§9 “appl[ies] to commercial product sellers”). [read post]