Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 21 - 40
of 6,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
On July 31, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a 4-3 opinion in People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 7:12 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:37 pm
He hits the same themes that I explained to my son: that you can use deadly force to prevent death or serious personal injury to yourself or others, but you generally can't use it solely to protect property. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:46 pm
Property of the People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
In Mora v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
In Mora v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:17 pm
Although we reject the People's claim that the constructive filing doctrine can be raised solely by petition for writ of habeas corpus filed first in the trial court, we agree that, while the People have heretofore shown no interest in opposing motions for constructive filing of appeal, we nonetheless must wait to decide such a motion only after at least 15 days have passed since the filing of the motion. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
The question is whether Lennett Baker is a mentally disordered offender.The sole witness for the People is Dr. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:31 am
There are people who have never even seen a Louboutin in person and know that red soles are the brand’s calling card. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
Regardless of what happens to you thereafter (and, as Justice Liu notes, one-third of people arrested for a felony don't ultimately get convicted of one). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:20 pm
Which means that the California Supreme Court is of the view that it wouldn't be an "arbitrary classification" to seek the death penalty solely against people whose victims were related to police officers. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm
'Cause that's in fact the Muslim way.Let's stipulate that your sole intent in having this conversation was in fact to try to persuade the guy to resolve the dispute civilly. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:25 pm
New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 (Apprendi) and Blakely v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 7:57 am
In a Massachusetts collection case, RIAA v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:38 am
People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:04 am
I've attempted in vain to think of a legal issue more depressing than the one squarely presented by the competing opinions in this case, which solely involves the following issue:Was the evidence here sufficient to support an inference that the defendant intended to kill his 13 week old baby when he tortured him? [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:03 pm
In Australian Communications and Media Authority v FHT Travel Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 550 the Federal Court found that FHT Travel Pty Limited (FHT Travel) and its sole director Yvonne Earnshaw breached the Do Not Call Register Act 2006 by making, or causing to be made, more than 12,000 marketing calls in less than a month to people who had placed their telephone numbers on the Do Not Call Register. [read post]
