Search for: "People v. Standard (1986)"
Results 21 - 40
of 644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Super. 1995) and Miller 508 A.2d 550 (Pa.Super, 1986). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
ZiontzTreaties on Trial: The Continuing Controversy over Northwest Indian Fishing Rights (1986) by Fay G. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:23 am
” People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
Changes include: (i) provisions specifically tailored to evolving markets such as life science transactions and cryptocurrency- and blockchain-related offerings; (ii) enhanced ethical and legal standards, such as inclusion in the Investor Rights Agreement of a covenant requiring adoption of a workplace code of conduct and anti-harassment policies; and (iii) adaptations to legal developments, such as new drafting options in response to the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act (2015), offering more… [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:09 am
Poirier earned his Juris Doctorate from Marquette University in 1986. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:58 am
In a series of cases culminating with Press-Enterprise v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
Ind.) in Bartole v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
Pix Credit hereThe greatest and most significant achievement during the last decades has been the independence from colonial and alien domination of a large number of peoples and nations which has enabled them to become members of the community of free peoples. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
Special Counsel Jack Smith has concluded that he can prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that several private lawyers acted as co-conspirators in former President Donald Trump’s criminal effort to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
Ginsberg v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:19 am
See Arnau v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:17 pm
-Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, pet. ref’d). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
Rev. 363, 370 (1986). [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
” People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Pott v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:54 pm
Ms Coburn noted that whilst the US is not party to the UNCRC nor OPIC, the Supreme Court in Golan v Saada appeared to apply a best interest standard in considering whether to return a child to their place of habitual residence under the HAC due to grave risk of harm. [read post]
