Search for: "People v. Stokes"
Results 21 - 40
of 197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:42 am
People v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:30 am
One of my favorites concerned the 1953 California appellate court case, Banks v. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
These stated “all properties procured under the policy will be as close to the borough as is reasonably practicable, given the financial constraints within which the service operates and the practical difficulties which can prevent units being procured in the borough or nearby locations” This had not been followed, given the numbers of people in 2020/21 being sent to Stoke on Trent. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
In a 6-1 Chamber Judgment in Taganrog LRO and Others v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 3:40 am
The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm
So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:27 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen is Distinguished University Chair and Professor at the University of St. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm
Peoples, 668 F. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:37 am
The report is not quite right; it says that Wieseltier accused Sullivan of anti-Semitism, when Wieseltier actually accused Sullivan of recklessly engaging in venomous rhetoric that gives aid and comfort to anti-Semites and stokes anti-Semitism. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 3:28 pm
Related Cases: Doe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:28 am
Fiendish lawyers, aided and abetted by those other enemies of the people, the judiciary, have developed this right into a tort all of its own: misuse of private information. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:10 am
In People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:14 pm
A survey shows that people do like the outcomes of most of the big Roberts Court cases, and that's out of line with the declining approval of the Court, but it might be that people are giving extra weight to some of the big cases, the ones they don't like — maybe Kelo (for Republicans) and Bush v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 10:01 am
See Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 7:04 am
Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:39 pm
Chrylser L.L.C., 481 Mich. 266 (2008), and People v. [read post]
