Search for: "People v. Strong (1994)"
Results 21 - 40
of 331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
A prima facie inference of copying is raised when there is substantial similarity between the original work and the allegedly infringing work, together with proof o the possibility of access (IBCOS Computers Ltd v Barclays Finance Ltd [1994] FSR 275, p.296-297). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Or are they representing and serving a class of people not reflecting the diversity of the public? [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
In doing so, he actually hurt many people. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
The people sent us a clear message. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The move to metrics has produced additional challenges.Regarding ESG metrics, there is a strong argument that the quality and reliability of ESG metrics need to improve. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
The Cubans and the US prefer the optics of remittances as a strategic weapon--the Americans to show from time to time their resolve against Cuban human rights abuses and their generosity to help the Cuban people; the Cubans because it is possible to mask the extent of the tax on these remittances and their laundering within the internal economy. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
Recently, the DOJ indicated a strong commitment to increase its focus on federal accessibility laws. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” —Sir Arthur Watts QC, KCMG (1994). [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
And the pre-FOIA cases do not present a strong case for breaching the deliberative process privilege without some particularized showing of need. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 3:58 pm
From SEC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 7:50 am
Brooks, 337 N.C. 132, 144 (1994). [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
On one hand, the employer's argument for a right to fire an employee is especially strong when the employee is harming the employer's bottom line rather than helping it (see Part II.F). [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:51 am
Barring enforcement-stage review is a strong measure, and the case that approved it, Yakus v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
”[13]And it is in no small part thanks to this work of repudiation that more people on the left as well as on the right now recognize the hollowness of liberalism’s pretensions to neutrality. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There being two legitimate aims, the next question was whether the restriction was proportionate to them; the means chosen to achieve those aim must (a) be rationally connected to the objective and not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations, (b) impair the right as little as possible, and (c) be such that their effects on rights are proportional to the objective … (Murphy v IRTC [46] (Barrington J), following Heaney v… [read post]
