Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Commons) (1982)"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
" 458 U.S. 886, 907, 909, 910, 933 (1982). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:33 am
Unlike the Federal Court, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice is a court of inherent jurisdiction whose jurisdiction to judicially review governmental action is a common law right as opposed to a statutory grant of power. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm
Quebec invoked it routinely under the Parti Québécois as a form of political protest, and then notably in 1988, following the Supreme Court of Canada decision Ford v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
In addition to this common-law right of access, there is also a First Amendment right of access to court documents in civil proceedings. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
In a motion filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – Commercial List on August 11, 2017, the lawyer for Retirees of Sears Canada cited s. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
Argued October 12, 1993 -- Decided May 26, 1994On certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Fashing, 457 U.S. 957 (1982). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
Waitangi Day protest, 2006 (Photo by Flickr user Charlie Brewer, Feb. 6, 2006, used under Creative Commons License 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). 1901: In Nireaha Tamaki v Baker, the Privy Council in London ruled that the courts did have jurisdiction to determine whether the land in dispute had been ceded to the Crown, in contrast to the approach that the New Zealand courts had taken since the Wi Parata case. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Justice Ewaschuk of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
(E.g., Guido Calabresi, A Common Law for the Age of Statutes (Union NJ: LawBook Exchange, 1999 (1982)). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
The first section unpacks the concept of law--common law, equity, statutes, regulation and law beyond law (social norms, and functional law. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
