Search for: "People v. Thomas (1987)" Results 21 - 40 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
~Thomas Jefferson, 1789 To underscore these points, the Framers provided in Article V, not just one but two methods (and four paths) for amendment. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Justices Marshall and Thomas had mustaches. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am by Amy Howe
Expanding gun rights Although he advocated for an incremental approach on abortion, Roberts joined Thomas’ opinion for the court in New York Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
Note especially that Thomas’s concurrence calls not only for the end of contraception protection, but also for overturning Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
These scams include embedded cyberattacks that “steal people’s personal data, peddle dodgy financial investments or break into bank accounts. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  A portion of the decision lamented the dearth of specifics offered by the People's Republic of China's State Secret Law with respect to determining whether information produced is protected and what liability would attach to that disclosure. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"] From Justice Christine Donohue's majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Max Baer and Justices Thomas Saylor and David Wecht) in In the Interest of Y.W. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Co., 827 F.2d 1291, 1293–95 (9th Cir. 1987) (state law "prohibiting the distribution of sexually explicit material to minors," which was seen as "embod[ying]" a "public policy" of "protecting minors from 'adult entertainment'"); Carlin Comnc'n, Inc. v. [read post]