Search for: "People v. Tims"
Results 21 - 40
of 702
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The High Court agreed in R (Harrison) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) that the current lack of provision for legal humanist weddings in England and Wales was in breach of Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:27 am
Fischer v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am
… But we were not willing to resign our peoples to this death sentence, occasioned by the continuing failure to take effective action against climate change. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
A. v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:00 am
/Idaho v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
This appears to be a known sort of deindexing trick, which I discussed at pp. 300-01 of my Shenanigans (Internet Takedown Edition) piece, and which has been known as far back as 2016, see this Tim Cushing (TechDirt) piece, and likely even earlier. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
This appears to be a known sort of deindexing trick, which I discussed at pp. 300-01 of my Shenanigans (Internet Takedown Edition) piece, and which has been known as far back as 2016, see this Tim Cushing (TechDirt) piece, and likely even earlier. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
As Tim notes in MBW, Mr. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:13 am
Auer; Transalta v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am
The Judge in respect of the UK, Tim Eicke, dissented on the violation of Article 8, though he agreed with his colleagues that there had been a violation of Article 6 (right to a fair trial). [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:15 am
The owners say Timmies’ terms and conditions don’t give them enough room to maneuver in the market. 💳 The Supreme Court is releasing Eurobank v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
This is a known sort of deindexing scam, which I discussed at pp. 300-01 of my Shenanigans (Internet Takedown Edition) piece, and which has been known as far back as 2016, see this Tim Cushing (TechDirt) piece, and likely even earlier. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Afflicted with a “culture of complacency[1],” the Ontario Superior Court has long struggled to timely advance cases to trial. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:03 am
Hannah V. [read post]
