Search for: "People v. Turley" Results 21 - 40 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2021, 3:52 am
 Per Turley (perturbingly):She said many abortion opponents, including the sponsors of the Mississippi abortion law at issue, hoped her three new colleagues would allow for the reversal or reduction of Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 4:05 am by jonathanturley
In the aftermath of the contentious Supreme Court arguments in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
The Italian legal proceedings Between 1966 and 1970, a first set of criminal proceedings took place in Italy, as the people suspected of having received and handled Victorious Youth faced accusations of fencing cultural property that belonged to the State.[11] The defendants were acquitted, due to a lack of evidence that Victorious Youth even existed (let alone that it was found in Italian waters). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:07 am by Elie Mystal
But some scholars –  like George Washington law professor Jonathan Turley — see amnesty for people like Balderas as some sort of threat to the rule of law in this country. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:55 am by SHG
Has enough time passed since the joy of Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) As I noted in an earlier post, Confronting Terror: 9/11 and the Future of American National Security is a new book of essays edited by Dean Reuter and John Yoo; the contributors include (among many others) Michael Chertoff, John Ashcroft, Laurence Silberman, Richard Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, Jonathan Turley, and Nadine Strossen.I thought I’d give people a flavor of this book by posting two chapters, one by former Attorney General John Ashcroft and Prof. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
 Thanks to Jonathan Turley for posting on last month's South Dakota Supreme Court decision that the First Amendment protects the right of people to yell expletives at cops. blank">South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:54 am by SHG
 § 704(b), having granted cert in  United States v. [read post]