Search for: "People v. Ward (1998)"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
’ (People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:18 pm
“Over one thousand people have registered on our secure website to tell us how the breach affected them. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:20 pm
The speech by MP Catherine Murphy suggested that the Irish people have been subsidising billionaire Denis O’Brien’s interest payments on massive loans. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
Russell. 1998. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:03 pm
“This is not speculative, this is not a matter of political correctness — people lose their jobs as a consequence of this. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
Cf., e.g., Ward v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
He had left solitary confinement for a prison hospital ward in June after the cancer was diagnosed. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:55 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Subsequent case law has found that the duty might (depending on the facts of specific cases) apply to the following situations: prison authorities protecting inmates from harm from other prisoners [Edwards v UK (2002) 36 EHRR 487], or from suicide [Keenan v UK (2001) 33 EHRR 913]; immigrants in administrative detention [Slimani v France (2006) 43 EHRR 49]; military conscripts [Lilinc V Turkey (App. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Plaintiffs cannot directly sue people for exercising their democratic right to participate in the political process, though they can frame those activities perceived to be contrary to their interests as torts.[15] Common torts that are used by plaintiffs include: defamation, inducing breach of contract, conspiracy, trespass, nuisance, and interference with contractual relations.[16] Examples of SLAPP lawsuits include framing boycotts as intentional interference with economic relations[17]… [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
By that time the Council had released further statistical information about the number of void properties broken down by ward. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
Justice R.V. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Union of India & Ors. 2006 (7) SCC 1, the expression "ordinary residence" as used in the Representation of People Act, 1950 fell for interpretation. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Pa. 1986); Montgomery Ward & Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Evidence was given at the trial that the VPR would have been circulated to not more than 150 people. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]
