Search for: "People v. Wendes" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:19 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
This principle came up last year in the case of Camelot Guardian Management Ltd v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:12 am by Charles Fox
  All of this wends us back to the IEP process. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]