Search for: "People v. Wendes" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
  It invites juries to decide cases on improper bases – that all these people wouldn’t be suing unless something was wrong. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In a scathing decision in Abdulaali v Salih, he stated, 1. [read post]