Search for: "People v. Whalen" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
"FOIL is to be liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly interpreted so that the public is granted maximum access to the records of government" (Matter of Capital Newspapers v Whalen, 69 NY2d 246, 252; see Buffalo News, Inc. v Buffalo Enterprise Dev. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It recalled the extensive commentary by Justice Kennedy, in the Court’s last same-sex marriage decision (United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm by Mark Bennett
Here the CCA drops a footnote to Ex Parte Kopecky, which cites Justice Rehnquist’s dissent in Whalen v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm by Mark Bennett
Here the CCA drops a footnote to Ex Parte Kopecky, which cites Justice Rehnquist’s dissent in Whalen v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
But if you want to multitask by getting some background on the substantive arguments before the Court while you listen, you could try the 2013 oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
Whalen of Nashville, an associate state solicitor general, will argue for the states on their power to refuse to recognize existing same-sex marriages. [read post]