Search for: "People v. White (1980)"
Results 21 - 40
of 402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
Worldwide, non-O157 STEC outbreaks emerged in the 1980s, and the first reported outbreaks in the United States occurred in the 1990s. [57, 55] The number of reported outbreaks due to non-O157 STECs remains relatively low in the United States, but experts agree that documented outbreaks probably represent the “tip of the iceberg. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 3:15 pm
In any event, by 1980—a few years after Roe v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
Stigmatic Injury, how the 11th Circuit got it wrong Laufer v Looper – the death of tester standing Laufer v Looper Ch. 2 (4) The division between the legitimate and (in my view) illegitimate uses of the ADA and FHA is not as black and white as this makes it seem. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:03 am
In fact, while this is far from clear from the Common App, the underlying classification scheme considers people from Afghanistan to be white. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
" To further that agenda, the Convention placed nine crimes in §241 of the State's Constitution as bases for disenfranchisement, believing that more Black people would be convicted of those crimes than White people. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
Worldwide, non-O157 STEC outbreaks emerged in the 1980s, and the first reported outbreaks in the United States occurred in the 1990s. [57, 55] The number of reported outbreaks due to non-O157 STECs remains relatively low in the United States, but experts agree that documented outbreaks probably represent the “tip of the iceberg. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
Lago v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
In the face of unyielding white Southern resistance to school desegregation, mid-20th-century liberals became passionate advocates of the view that the Supreme Court, and only the Court, is in charge of interpreting the Constitution. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
That was not intended to express disdain; rather, it had become quite clear that judges in general had little demonstrated interest in legal scholarship as it was developing in the 1980s and thereafter, when traditional doctrinal analysis was becoming subordinated to more self-consciously “theoretical” concerns. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 5:35 pm
As the United States Supreme Court explained long ago in Hudson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
She is perfectly free to photograph only white people or only Buddhists. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
” Not only do people enter with full knowledge but there is no charge. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
Virginia (1980) (citation omitted); see also First Nat'l Bank of Boston v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
They are literally the only people whose opinions genuinely count in his version of the law. [read post]
