Search for: "People v. Whittaker"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Chapin, 299 AD2d 294; Kent v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 1:49 pm
Impeachment of a Verdict Based on a Juror’s Unwillingness to Deliberate The Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, Division Five rendered an opinion in Cornavaca v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
Moreover, once Goldberg replaced Frankfurter and White replaced Whittaker in 1962, there was a six person liberal majority for civil rights legislation (I should note, however, that one of the six, Hugo Black, dissented in South Carolina v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:20 pm
But if that’s not the case, banker people… then you have to fix it… before you’re allowed to foreclose. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The types of people appointed to the court have also changed. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
