Search for: "People v. Williams (1993)"
Results 21 - 40
of 317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
The logic of Rehnquist’s 1993 memo would seem to be in tension with landmark Supreme Court cases such as the Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:25 am
People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:25 am
People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:36 pm
Williams v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm
William B. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Ohio first joined this movement in 1993 in Arnold v. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 6:19 pm
In People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
R v Ahluwalia (1993) Siobhan Weare64. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am
” The William and Mary Quarterly, Jan., 1993, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 85-111. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:43 am
When Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1993, she had never ruled in a death penalty case. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
In Bedder v Bedder, 2013 WL 504022 (S.D.Ohio) On January 2, 2013, Petitioner Jonathan William Bedder filed a petition for the return of his daughter, "R," to Canada. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 11:21 am
She clerked for then-Judge Sotomayor on SDNY in 1993. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 2:37 am
Int'l, 991 F.2d 426, 434 (8th Cir. 1993); In re Napster, Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 9:27 pm
Lagna v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
Carter Snead is the William P. and Hazel B. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
[Drawn from William Eskridge and Christopher Riano's comprehensive new book on the subject.] [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
