Search for: "People v. Winston" Results 21 - 40 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Peter Jacobs
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
 So as our hero Winston Churchill was wont to say- those who do not change their minds do not change anything. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:15 am by Kevin
In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense.AVI v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
As the U.S. prepares to re-open after an unprecedented moment of pause during the COVID-19 pandemic, many people across the country have used this time for personal reflection. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm by Jason Kelley
He is like an arrow pointed towards a goal of illuminating science for people. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
On 13 June 2019 was a hearing before Norris J in the case of Winstone v MGN. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
Holmes was such a well-known wit that he suffered from the Mark Twain or Winston Churchill syndrome of having just about any commonplace witty saying of the day attributed to him. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  The Law Society Gazette had a piece on the case: “People who live in glass houses shouldn’t make article 8 claims”. [read post]