Search for: "People v. York (1980)"
Results 21 - 40
of 603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
In this review, we use several sources for the cohort: (1) the civil business-fraud case brought against Trump, his family members, and his businesses by the New York Attorney General; (2) the 2020 “Kraken” King v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
Most notably, O'Connor wrote the Court's majority opinion in New York v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
During his campaign for president in 1980, Ronald Reagan had promised to nominate a woman to the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
” Kansas v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am
Hoover v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:06 pm
One is immediately thrust back to the 1970s and the early 1980s--to the normative workshop of Fidel Castro (Odious Debt Wears Two Faces: Systemic Illegitimacy, Problems, and Opportunities in Traditional Odious Debt Conceptions in Globalized Economic Regimes). [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 3:37 pm
Verdun v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The people getting sued under the disability rights provisions of the ADA and FHA were not evil; they were negligent. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
A student this semester, for instance, asked me who the “Buckley” was in Buckley v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
A student this semester, for instance, asked me who the “Buckley” was in Buckley v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1980); United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:03 am
New York, 588 U. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Plaintiffs faced with the prospect of these harms might choose not to litigate: People who were sexually assaulted, for instance, might be reluctant to continue with their lawsuits once pseudonymity is denied; likewise for people who have been libeled, or who have been pretextually fired by their employers. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm
It’s also possible that a particularly forward-thinking writer would try to fashion his 1980s loan-out arrangement to preserve future statutory termination rights. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:31 am
But one other interesting thing about it is that it reaffirmed the validity of a 1980 case called Maine v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
