Search for: "Performance Contractors, Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
In May of 2012, the New York City School Construction Authority awarded BG National Plumbing & Heating Inc. a contract to perform accessibility and electrical upgrades for the New York City School Construction Authority. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 11:35 am
” Motion Motors, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:51 am
Epoxy Solutions Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
Last week a Nike Inc. contractor factory in Indonesia agreed to pay workers over $1 million to settle allegations that the shoe manufacturer forced workers to perform a daily hour of overtime work without compensation. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 10:51 am
” The performance bond “provides protection to the government in situations where the prime contractor defaults in the performance of work or is terminated for default. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
©2015 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 9:08 am
When a contractor abandons or is terminated from a construction project before substantial completion, one of the first tasks for the owner/developer (or for the contractor’s performance bond surety if such a bond exists) is to locate and hire a completion contractor. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:44 am
In this premises liability case we represented a contractor that performed an excavation and laying of underground gas pipelines at an apartment complex. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 5:57 am
If the contract doesn’t require you to perform work, the Government cannot obligate you to perform additional work without compensation. [read post]
2 May 2018, 9:36 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 5:52 pm
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its unanimous ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc., v Superior Court, making it even harder for companies to classify workers as independent contractors (rather than employees). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:00 am
’s (Pacific Caisson) petition for review of the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal’s decision affirming the trial court’s judgment that Pacific Caisson did not substantially comply with the requirement that a contractor be licensed while performing work requiring a license, as contemplated by Section 7031(e) of California’s Contractors’ State License Law, Cal. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:11 pm
The California Supreme Court recently announced a new test for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor in the landmark decision of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 6:25 am
The government, on the other hand, is not a fan.The California Court of Appeal in JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:57 pm
The verification functions in question had been performed by Monterey Consultants, Inc. under a VA BPA. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
TechTrend, Inc. submitted a proposal. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:07 pm
In the case, Mepco Services, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 9:12 am
In Softrock Geological Services, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:26 am
The Court’s decision in Baistar Mechanical, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
Department of Justice announced yesterday that defense contractor DRS Technical Services Inc. [read post]
