Search for: "Person v. Cosby" Results 21 - 40 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States CNN reports that a settlement has been reached in a defamation case against Bill Cosby — but representatives for the comedian say he didn’t cut the deal. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved. .United States There has been widespread reporting of Thomas J’s concurring opinion [pdf] in the case of McKee v Cosby to the effect that the US Supreme Court should reconsider New York Times v Sullivan. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:58 am by Dan
Cosby In his concurrence, Justice Thomas began by focusing on the jurisprudence that came after New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:07 am by Stephanie Sundier
US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Tuesday called for the court to review its ruling in New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:45 am
The court below had decided that the woman, Kathrine McKee, was a "limited person public figure" who would have to show that Cosby had "reckless disregard" for the truth when he said defamatory things about her. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 am by Lyle Denniston
Enhancing the case’s visibility was the fact that it involved an accusation of rape against one of America’s best-known entertainment figures – actor, comedian and TV personality Bill Cosby – who has been convicted and imprisoned for one of more than two dozen incidents of claimed sexual assault. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:38 am by Amy Howe
McKee argued that one of Cosby’s lawyers wrote a defamatory letter that was leaked to the public, but her lawsuit was dismissed on the ground that she had become, at least for purposes of the allegations against Cosby, a public figure and could not recover damages unless she could show that Cosby and his lawyers acted with malice. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm by John Dean
Just ask Anita Hill, or the women who revealed Bill Cosby’s predatory behavior. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:44 am by SHG
“My wife’s personal beliefs and her professional activities are of no consequence. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
NT1 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 67 (QB) (18 January 2018) https://t.co/gfCZCY9xKn 2018-01-19 Piracy used to be file-sharing. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For the women raped years ago, the rape SOLs were short then, and the Supreme Court has made it impossible to give them a second chance at criminal prosecution under Stogner v. [read post]