Search for: "Persons v. Summers"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2024, 6:43 pm
Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm
And in cert denial news, we are sad that the Supreme Court will not take up Pollreis v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:52 am
And I don’t think that you would want generative AI training on everything, you know, the menu for the summer, associate lunch, the email where you are, you know, RSVP to the party or something. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:23 pm
Five months later, the Supreme Court granted cert in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
That was the argument before the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Malicki v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:47 am
Pa.) in Monge v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The third cause of action alleges a violation of Executive Law § 296(4) of the NYSHRL, which provides that it is "an unlawful discriminatory practice for an educational institution to deny the use of its facilities to any person otherwise qualified or to permit the harassment of any student or applicant by reason of his race. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The third cause of action alleges a violation of Executive Law § 296(4) of the NYSHRL, which provides that it is "an unlawful discriminatory practice for an educational institution to deny the use of its facilities to any person otherwise qualified or to permit the harassment of any student or applicant by reason of his race. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:05 am
For its part, V-Dem considers Kosovo an “electoral democracy” vs. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Key US Supreme Court decisions, such as Jones v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Egilman’s affidavit, and the plaintiffs’ counsel’s briefs, which were considered and rejected by Judge Jones.[10] Egilman’s affidavit in connection with the so-called Oregon hearings, which took place during the summer of 1996, was not a particularly important piece of evidence. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:19 pm
Sadly, since 2022’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
And in 1982, in Nixon v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Personal jurisdiction aficionados have been buzzing about the Court's decision last summer in Mallory v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Indeed, they must be if humanity is to survive and flourish in the face of existential threats.[26] One reason is that the collective power of business to influence some of these large problems is at least equivalent to the power of nations or global assemblages of only governments and nonprofit organizations.[27] Extending my previous descriptive argument in Business Persons prescriptively, business firms are best understood as “real fictions” in society that are legally… [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
Coniston Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:13 pm
See, e.g., Sargent v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
Tuesday’s argument was the first time that the justices had considered efforts to restrict abortion since their 2022 decision to eliminate the constitutional right to an abortion, in Dobbs v. [read post]
