Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 13,531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
., filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:21 am
Blanford v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
United States has come to an unceremonious end and all Americans should be concerned. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:46 am
United States that one cannot use the good-faith defense, especially when it’s based on an attorney’s counsel. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Union, Local 200 United, 19 NY3d 1009, 1011 [2012]; North Syracuse Cent. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Union, Local 200 United, 19 NY3d 1009, 1011 [2012]; North Syracuse Cent. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
United States, and Shoop v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:23 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the circuit split. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard): On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:51 am
Garland, 593 U.S. 155, 171–72 (2021); United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:00 pm
The Court denied Du Pont’s request to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s judgment affirming the jury’s $40 million award in favor of plaintiffs, a married couple, asserting negligence claims against Du Pont. [read post]
