Search for: "Pettit v. Pettit" Results 21 - 40 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The conclusion maintains that a liberal originalist approach to interpreting the Connecticut constitution is preferable to the less generous approach to deciding individual rights cases articulated by the Connecticut Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 5:38 am by Alfred Brophy
Eric Yamamoto, Miyoko Pettit, and Sara Lee have posted on ssrn an extensive paper on the Jeju massacre, in which perhaps as many as 30,000 South Korean citizens were killed. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:41 am
Although the constitutionality of sobriety checkpoints has been challenged repeatedly across the country, it has consistently been upheld. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:34 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Filed: 01/24/2008[United Kingdom] [Summary judgment denied]Pawananun, v  Pettit, 2020 WL 7585621( U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:51 am by Gary A. Watt
  Those cases set out a "plausibility--fair notice" standard replacing the longstanding "no set of facts" standard from Conley v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm by WIMS
The panel remanded the case for the district court to determine whether the ethanol provisions discriminate in purpose or effect and, if not, to apply the balancing test established in Pike v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm by NL
Commissioner Rowland’s formula, adopted by Mr Perdios, was wrong.Many thanks to Sean Pettit of 1 Pump Court and Tony Owen of TV Edwards for the report. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:42 pm by NL
Commissioner Rowland’s formula, adopted by Mr Perdios, was wrong.Many thanks to Sean Pettit of 1 Pump Court and Tony Owen of TV Edwards for the report. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:00 am by Kevin Sheerin
Matter of Pettit v Scipio Volunteer Fire District             The District and the Workers’ Compensation Carrier appealed the Workers’ Compensation Board decision that ruled that Claimant’s injuries occurred within her duties as a volunteer firefighter. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:03 pm
  The only exception to the trustee being personally liable is where he has specifically contracted to limit his liability to the assets of the trust.[9]             The authorities bear this out: see, for instance, Benett v Wyndham (1862), 4 DeG F & J 259 (CA);  Muir v City of Glasgow Bank (1879), 4 App Cas 337 (HL); Davis v Sawkiw(1983), 38 OR (2d) 466 (H Ct… [read post]