Search for: "Petty v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm by Thomas Surmanski
It is pretty clear that [Jordan] means the date of decision” (para. 16). 2018 Trial Court Decisions: CharleyIn late June, 2018, the Ontario Superior Court turned its mind to this question in the case of R. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm by Georgialee Lang
In a 2012 decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, Dore v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
After a jury empaneled by the Middlesex County Superior Court convicted Roger Beattie of two counts of perjury in violation of 268 Massachusetts General Laws §1, Beattie appealed. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm by Andrew Langille
Nixon, 2005 BCCA 601 (also see the Superior Court decision).In the recently released decision in Rocha v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:51 am
Quebec’s Superior Court and Court of Appeal upheld the suspension. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
” – Nakatsuru J. in Morris, at para. 1 R v Morris is a sentencing decision delivered in the Ontario Superior Court by Justice S. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:22 pm by Heather Donkers
” – Nakatsuru J. in Morris, at para. 1 R v Morris is a sentencing decision delivered in the Ontario Superior Court by Justice S. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 12:04 am
Bringing discredit on the employerWilburn v McMahon, App. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:29 pm
All adult indictable offenses will be heard in the Monmouth County Superior Court - Criminal Part. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:29 pm
All adult indictable offenses will be heard in the Monmouth County Superior Court - Criminal Part. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
        Argued October 12, 1993 -- Decided May 26, 1994On certification to the Superior Court, Law Division, Middlesex County.Simon Louis Rosenbach, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Robert W. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 9:06 am by Dwight Sullivan
As the Navy-Marine Corps Court has helpfully summarized:  Our superior court has noted that “Articles 92 and 86(1) of the Code may overlap in certain situations involving reporting for military duty. [read post]