Search for: "Philip Bobbitt"
Results 21 - 40
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 9:30 pm
Financial Times has published a review, by Frances Fukuyama, of Philip Bobbit, The Garments of Court and Palace: Machiavelli and the World that He Made (Atlantic Books). [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
Whether or not "we are all ___ now" as constitutional law scholars, in the classroom we are all Philip Bobbitt now. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 1:36 pm
Philip D. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
Columbia's Philip Bobbitt sued the law firm formerly known as Milberg Weiss this week for allegedly messing up a class action suit. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
This article builds on Philip Bobbitt's remarkable work in constitutional theory, which posits a practice-based constitution based in six accepted "modalities" of argument. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 6:14 am
The article explains the topical approach to constitutional argument and contrasts it with Philip Bobbitt’s well-known theory of “modalities” of constitutional argument. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 6:14 am
The article explains the topical approach to constitutional argument and contrasts it with Philip Bobbitt’s well-known theory of “modalities” of constitutional argument. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 2:04 pm
I love Philip Bobbitt's work in Constitutional Interpretation and Constitutional Fate, almost Talmudic in how it sees each issue from every side, and shows how every form of constitutional argumentation can be used for just about any substantive position. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 7:47 am
Here is the abstract:In his recent book Constitutional Interpretation, Philip Bobbitt claims that the generally accepted modalities are how we understand the Constitution at the ground level, not how we later interpret it. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 10:56 am
by Kenneth Anderson So concludes Philip Bobbitt, in an email comment to Ben Wittes, responding to his post on the question raised at Lawfare, here at OJ, and at Volokh, as well as in an opinion piece this morning by the New York Times public editor, Arthur Brisbane. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:32 am
In it I offer a short primer on the modalities of constitutional argument, as Philip Bobbitt has described them. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 3:43 pm
Bobbitt is the Herbert Wechsler Professor of Federal Jurisprudence and director for the Center for National Security at Columbia Law School. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:55 pm
Professor Philip Bobbitt proposes a pluralist account of American constitutional law that is both descriptive and prescriptive. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 3:25 pm
The ambition here is to discover the function of the War on Terror within an emerging neo-liberal world order.Most useful in that discovery is Philip Bobbitt's Terror and Consent, perhaps the most comprehensive disquisition so far on terrorism and the War on Terror. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:06 am
You should know first that I endorse, and work within, Philip Bobbitt's approach to constitutional argument and interpretation. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:35 pm
(Think about what drives second term presidents, for example.).Arguments from the future do not fit easily into Philip Bobbitt's famous account of the modalities of constitutional argument. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:59 pm
Here is the abstract: This article builds on Philip Bobbitt's Wittgensteinian insights into constitutional argument and law. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:45 pm
, Jeff Tulis (moderator)Philip Bobbitt, Jacob Gersen, Stephen Griffin, Tom McGarity, Stephen SkowronekSaturday (Eidman Courtroom)9:15-10:45am: Governance and the judiciary, Scot Powe (moderator)Adam Liptak, James Gibson, Alan Tarr11:00-12:15: Governance from the State perspective, Lynn Baker (moderator)Bruce Cain, John Dinan1:30-3:30pm: Thinking about the future (and outside the box?) [read post]
The problematics of impeachment (I): The specific problems of Charles Black's take on the presidency
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
But his principal fame now is as the author of the slender book recently republished by the Yale Press with much new material added by my friend and colleague Philip Bobbitt. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 7:44 am
Truthmakerless constitutional theories like those of Judge Posner, Eric Segall or the early Felix Frankfurter cannot vindicate “wrong the day it was decided” (WTDIWD) data from the Court itself, and irreducibly plural constitutional theories like those of Philip Bobbitt cannot vindicate such data in cases where constitutional modes conflict. [read post]
