Search for: "Phillips v. U. S"
Results 21 - 40
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
Employee reinstated with back pay following termination pursuant to Section 73 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Hoover v County of Broome, 2009 NY Slip Op 51563(U), Decided on July 21, 2009, Supreme Court, Broome County, Judge Phillip R. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 5:01 pm
Adams & Assoc., LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 11:00 am
C. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Madden v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:36 am
Press 2017).Melissa Murray, Obergefell v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Phillip Johnson, Defendant. 2009QN068173 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York Queens County Decided on June 24, 2010 Attorney for defendant: Michael Horn Queens Law Associates Attorney for the People: ADA Jonathan Selkowe Elisa S. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
(See e.g., Leff v Fulbright & aworski, L.L.P., 78 AD3d 531, 533 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011] [damages in malpractice case “grossly speculative” where plaintiff could not establish what would have occurred but for defendants’ conduct]; Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Grp. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 3:18 am
Alrose Steinway, LLC v Jaspan Schlesinger, LLP 2021 NY Slip Op 30619(U) March 5, 2021Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 151482/2017 Judge: Andrea Masley is a long, reasoned and detailed discussion of a legal malpractice claim based upon a projection of future commercial events. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
A (Appellant) v Essex County Council & National Autistic Society (Intervener) [2010] UKSC 33 Supreme Court (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke) July 14 2010 The right to education under Article 2 Protocol 1 of the Convention was not breached by the delay in catering for the special educational needs of a child. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 11:22 am
The majority opinion in Bostock identified three decisions that also expanded the meaning of sex discrimination under Title VII: – In Phillips v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:00 pm
Lee, 136 S. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:18 am
Rupp v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 9:02 am
(The case is docketed in the Circuit Court as Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:33 am
The original complaint may be viewed here: file:///C:/Users/JNewman/Documents/Long-ex-rel-US-v-Modernizing-Medicine-Daniel-Cane-qui-tam-complaint.pdf The whistleblower is represented by Phillips and Cohen law firm. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 5:44 am
., Inc. v Grimaldi 2024 NY Slip Op 32966(U) August 23, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157238/2021 Judge: Judy H. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:45 pm
Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Bostock cites three cases that built on Title VII’s concept of sex discrimination: – Phillips v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:27 pm
Supreme Court decision in the case of Bostock v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:47 am
”‘ (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, LP., v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimp, LLP, 265 AD2d at 210.) [read post]
