Search for: "Phoenix v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 983
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2023, 1:21 pm by Asbestos Legal Center
Grace Fireproofing-vermiculite etc… 26% Primarily Fireproofiting sites Western Asbestos Trust Various Insulation Supply/Contracting 51.1% Most Valuable Trust in the Country – Nationwide -Must file claims w/in 1 year of Date of Death unless exceptions State Insulation Corp Asbestos P.I. [read post]
 For example, in Unico Mechanical Corporation, the GAO sustained the protest where the agency unreasonably assessed a weakness (1) notwithstanding the proposal met the solicitation’s stated minimum requirement, and (2) for a mistaken finding that the offeror did not address a feature in its proposal. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Third, the documents Plaintiff seeks to seal are currently available in the public record in Phoenix Capital Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
Phoenix Bridge Company, 98 N.H. 261 (1953), was a suit by a concrete subcontractor on a State bridge project who agreed to “be bound by and conform to the general specifications in all respects wherein they apply to the work embraced in this agreement” and agreed to accept payment “for the quantity of material approved by the State Highway Commission. [read post]
However, the traditional “surviving patent” approach according to Harnkatheterset is now under some scrutiny: A referral to the CJEU by Munich I Regional Court resulted in the decision C-44/21 Phoenix Contact v Harting, in which it was held that a “surviving patent only” approach is incompatible with the Enforcement Directive. [read post]
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:53 am by Ezra Rosser
And in this case, favoring non-Indian water users (Los Angeles (really California in general), Las Vegas, Phoenix, etc) over reservation needs. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:52 pm by Chris Dreyer
That all changed in 1977 when one Phoenix law firm ran an ad in a local newspaper that became the basis for the landmark decision in Bates v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:38 am by Michael Oykhman
Lawful excuse As explicitly stated in section 127 itself, there is no offence where the accused has a lawful excuse to disobey the court order. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 9:08 am by Eric Goldman
Phoenix Fair Use Protects High School’s Use of Inspirational Meme–Bell v. [read post]