Search for: "Pierce, Appeal of" Results 21 - 40 of 1,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2018, 7:51 pm by Michael Stevens
Calvert, Executrix of Est of James Calvert COA Not Published (6/1/2018) Reverse piercing of the corporate veil was raised in this appeal. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm by Michael Smith
 The Indiana Court of Appeals answered that question, and a couple of others related to veil piercing, in Country Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm by Michael Smith
 The Indiana Court of Appeals answered that question, and a couple of others related to veil piercing, in Country Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:17 pm by Michael Smith
 The Indiana Court of Appeals answered that question, and a couple of others related to veil piercing, in Country Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:32 am by Gene Quinn
Indeed, the new Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property at the University of New Hampshire School of Law will formally open with a bang! [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:27 am
Locastro, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed a lower court's ruling that a parent who signed a waiver form related to her daughter's ear piercing was liable for the piercing company's costs and fees in a law suit filed after the daughter sustained an infection. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:25 am by Cari Rincker
The creditor filed a motion seeking to pierce the veil of Baldwin’s LLC and won the case on appeal. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 3:40 pm by Robert Liles
(Updated January 9, 2021): Owners of healthcare companies often wonder whether the government can pierce the corporate veil and try to hold the owners personally liable for overpayment claims when facing a program integrity audit by a Unified Program Integrity Contractor (UPIC). [1] This rarely happens, but assuming that a provider does not prevail in the administrative appeal process, one way for the government to try and collect monies owed by a bankrupt health care entity would… [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:42 pm
Pierce County argued that without fees that some owners may have “frivolous appeals”. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:13 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
The plaintiff appealed, and the Supreme Court granted review solely on whether the enterprise theory of liability is available in Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:34 am
Further, the record reveals that defendant Adjmi utilized that control to commit the wrong complained of, thereby resulting in injury to the plaintiff (see, Majestic Factors Corp. v Latino, 15 Misc. 2d 329, mot. to dismiss appeal granted 8 A.D.2d 594). [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:23 am by Robert Kreisman
According to the appeals panel’s opinion, studies have shown that Illinois courts pierced the corporate veil in approximately 42% to 52% of the cases. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 9:07 am by J. Ross Pepper
As well, in a 2012 opinion, the Court of Appeals of Tennessee ruled that the veil of a limited liability company could be pierced in the case of Edmunds v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:28 am by Patricia W. Moore
The opinion of the Massachusetts Appeals Court begins: The plaintiffs appeal from the denial of their motion for sanctions against Bingham McCutchen LLP (Bingham), intervener, the law firm that defended Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. [read post]