Search for: "Plaintiff v. United States Marshals Service"
Results 21 - 40
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2013, 8:24 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Social media behemoth Facebook and an Oregon ad agency have been sued for copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.] in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the company that licenses and manages the music of 40-year-old rapper/songwriter Eminem (Marshall Bruce Mathers III).In the Complaint filed May 20, Eight Mile Style, LLC & Martin Affiliated LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Curtis V. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:41 am
All federal judges take an oath to administer justice under the Constitution and laws of the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:36 pm
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:05 am
Executive Office United States Marshals, 2011 U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
Altschul only states that “[t]he legal services were reasonably required to defend the Plaintiffs herein against claims for breach of a union collective bargaining agreement the Plaintiffs were a party to at the specific request of the Plaintiffs” (NYSCEF Doc No. 245, Altschul aff, ~ 5). [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
To accomplish this, the US party must submit the following to China’s Ministry of Justice: a completed United States Marshall Form USM? [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
To accomplish this, the US party must submit the following to China’s Ministry of Justice: a completed United States Marshall Form USM? [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
(Orin Kerr) No, claims the plaintiff in Wong v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
The plaintiff is a California corporation that provides residential design and decoration services, including the delivery, staging and leasing of home furnishings and décor. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:47 am
We cannot now determine if the representative party will fairly protect the interests of the class.We note that the plaintiff has failed to include with his complaint the required form of instructions for the United States Marshal for directions as to service of process.For the foregoing reasons we must exercise our discretion to refuse the prayer of plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis.From the Gallagher guide on Judicial Humor. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
Wallace, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:06 am
When state officials refused to provide this bus service, Ms. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
“In their haste to reach the merits of the plaintiffs’ Establishment Clause claim,” he noted, “my colleagues in the majority neglect to follow the longstanding and well-defined requirements of Article III of the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
United States Forest Service (2007), the U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
§ 1361, federal courts may issue writs of “mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
United States Marshals Service, 2016 U.S. [read post]
