Search for: "Plaintiffs 3-30" Results 21 - 40 of 6,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2016, 9:07 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
However, the court refused to lift the default judgment and awarded the Williamses over $3 million in damages. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:07 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
However, the court refused to lift the default judgment and awarded the Williamses over $3 million in damages. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:48 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The Court noted that the evidence showed that the police officer responding to the accident estimated plaintiff’s speed at 43 miles per hour, while the speed limit was 30 miles per hour. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:17 pm
Auster Company, No. 1-07-2604 (3-30-09) found that the trial court erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of defendants dismissing plaintiff's wrongful death and survival complaint for negligent maintenance of elevator doors in warehouse building through which plaintiff's decedent, employee of sub lessee, fell and died. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:15 pm
Range of motion of flexion is to 90 degrees (90 degrees normal), extension to 30 degrees (30 degrees normal), right and left lateral bending to 30 degrees (30 degrees normal) and right and left rotation to 30 degrees (30 degrees normal). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:26 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
To establish a claim for medical or dental negligence in Maryland, a plaintiff must prove (1) the applicable standard of care; (2) that this standard has been violated; and (3) that this violation caused the complained of harm. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:03 am by emagraken
 I am further satisfied that an apportionment of costs of 70% to the plaintiff and 30% to the defendant, as submitted by the defendant, is fair in the circumstances of this case, given the amount for past income loss awarded to the plaintiff, when compared with his claimed amount; the fact that the plaintiff abandoned his claim for future income loss at the commencement of the trial; and, the inordinate amount of time which had to be spent by the defence… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Soroush Seifi
  However, in Garland, Justice Cullity accepts that there is a chance for an appearance of conflict of interest that could arise if such compensation were to be awarded routinely.[30]  However, because the test was set strictly, the judicial discretion to award compensation in a Cy-près in distribution Garland would not open the flood gates of conflict of interest amongst class members. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 4:26 pm by Levin & Perconti
Score Sports Venutre, No. 1-0901476 (3-30-10) affirmed a case where the plaintiff was injured when she caught her foot on a rope exercise ladder hidden underneath curtain behind tennis court while playing at indoor tennis club where she was member. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sept. 30, 2015) The Rooftops allowed patrons to view live Cubs games from their location near Wrigley Field, until the Cubs built a video board that blocked the view from the Rooftops. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:41 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Plaintiff’s fall occurred on April 30, 2012, and he did not present any evidence that he informed defendant about problems with the stairs between the repair and the fall or that defendant otherwise had knowledge of any alleged problems preceding the fall. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 7:11 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendants' motion to compel plaintiff to produce a 30(b)(6) witness for deposition regarding profitability and license agreements. [read post]