Search for: "Police Benevolent Assn. of the City of N.Y. v City of New York"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
The Section 207-c procedure allows an employee to dispute any specific tasks assigned to him pursuant to a light-duty assignment.The Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division’s ruling.These administrative procedures belied the union’s claim that an employee would not have meaningful review of the determination of his eligibility for light duty if he or she is not allowed to demand arbitration pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement.Also the Appellate Division noted that… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Further, public policy limitations on arbitrability are rare and "almost invariably" involve a nondelegable constitutional or statutory duty (Matter of Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y. v New York State Pub. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:39 am
”As the current dispute depends on the interpretation of the CBA's no-layoff clause in order to determine whether that provision is applicable to the Village's action in abolishing six firefighters' positions, the court ruled that this was an issue that the parties agreed to submit to arbitration.Thus, said the court, Supreme Court properly determined that the parties' substantive disagreement as to the meaning and application of the no-layoff clause is to be resolved by… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:58 am
Matter of Village of Spring Val. v Policemen's Benevolent Assn. of Vil. of Spring Val., 271 AD2d 615; Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:34 pm
Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc., 56 AD3d 70; Reversed, New York Court of Appeals, 2009 NY Slip Op 09314. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:01 am
” The court note that the Police Department's scientific evidence indicated that inadvertently ingesting marijuana in contaminated food and inhaling secondhand smoke could not cause the high levels of marijuana Chiolalo’s hair samples.Although Chiolalo claimed that using the radioimmunoassay method of hair testing violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure because the use of that method was not authorized by the Police… [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:16 am
The Court of Appeals has held that the Commissioner was empowered to choose the method of drug testing, and that choice was not subject to collective bargaining (see Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc., NY3d , 2009 NY Slip Op 09314 [2009]). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
"* Matter of City of New York v Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc., 56 AD3d 70; posted on the Internet at:[www.nycourts.gov]The Goldin decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.nycourts.gov] [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Treating groups in the collective bargaining unit differently does not always constitute to a violation of the union's duty of fair representationCalkins v Police Benevolent Assn. of N.Y. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:24 am
Powles Subscription Required
APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT Government
Troopers Lack Standing to Challenge Policy Denying Right to Counsel at 'Critical Incident' Questioning
Police Benevolent Assn. of N.Y. [read post]
