Search for: "Poole v. Baker"
Results 21 - 40
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Donald Edward Baker v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
(Patent Docs) Baytril / Cipro / Ciprodex / Fludara / Legend / Proleukin - US: District Court W D Tennessee: False marking complaint: Baker v Bayer Aktiengescellschaft Corp. et al. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 2:54 pm
Baker, 658 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2011), Sanchez v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am
Justice Alito’s point was broadened by Justice Kavanaugh who at oral argument in the Mississippi case at issue, observed that, stare decisis notwithstanding, there is a Supreme Court history of overruling cases, [citing] Brown v Board (desegregating public schools) Baker v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Also see ---> Private student loan collection suit not removable to federal court (addressing state vs. federal jurisdiction issue in context of original collection suit; sanctions imposed for improper removal in Richards v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm
" Ricci v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
by Dennis Crouch Peter v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:20 am
” Before Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
The lower courts in Baker v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Constitution by depriving same-sex couples of the fundamental right to marry, including recognition of their lawful, out-of-state marriages; (2) whether a state impermissibly infringes upon same-sex couples’ fundamental right to interstate travel by refusing to recognize their lawful out-of-state marriages; and (3) whether this Court’s summary dismissal in Baker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Baker, the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Persephone Bridgman Baker provides a useful analysis of the merits of ABC itself. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 1:38 pm
Case Study No. 1 Baker, Donelson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 9:01 am
Georgia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Mar. 28, 2012) 13, 23 Baker v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 4:58 pm
(Patent Docs) Products Alavert (Loratadine) – US: TTAB vacates WAL-VERT decision per District Court order: Wyeth v Walgreen Co (not precedential) (TTABlog) Axid (Nizatidine), Synthanthic (Oxfendazole) – US: False marking complaint: Baker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:00 am
In 1937, in West Coast Hotel Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
The “prize” is a government monopoly that allows the holder to charge prices in excess of the free market price for the term of the monopoly.Pros – (i) It allows companies to recoup their research costs by monopoly pricing for the duration of the patent; and (ii) the monopoly incentive may encourage research spending.Cons- (i) It may reduce, as well as add, to the pool of knowledge that others can draw upon; (ii) the monopoly may serve to reduce incentives to invest in R… [read post]
