Search for: "Pooler v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2022, 4:32 pm
Pooler, Gerard E. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:46 am
Citing a Second Circuit case from 1977 as well as cases from the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, the Court of Appeals (Pooler, Sack and Park) notes that "an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:46 am
In dismissing this claim, the district court stated that "[a]lthough the Second Circuit has not ruled on whether a private right of action exists under Title IX for claims of employment discrimination, '[a]n overwhelming majority of district courts in this Circuit have found that an implied private right of action does not exist[] under Title IX for employees alleging gender discrimination in the terms and conditions of their employment.'" The Court of Appeals… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:04 am
From Vengalattore v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:58 am
" In Erving v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 9:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 6:38 am
It's a different story with the state false arrest claim.The case is Triolo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 6:36 am
He gets the state verdict back, but the federal claim is gone.The case is Triolo v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:24 am
" In a prior case, Costabile v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 6:09 am
Like in this case.The case is Taylor v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 10:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 10:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:13 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 6:03 am
This case asks when the arbitration "agreement" in a consumer transaction can be invalidated.The case is Soliman v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:00 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Park and Pooler) remands the case to the district court to decide if these allegations state a plausible claim under the Iqbal pleading standard. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 5:57 am
This case shows us how it all works.The case is Watley v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:50 am
The Court of Appeals (Pooler, Kearse and Calabresi) agrees and finds against the plaintiffs. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 am
The rare en banc vote was 7-5.The case is Francis v. [read post]